105mm (158mm equivalent) is not that long, so if you can't be at the sidelines, you may want to supplement the 18-105 with a lens with longer reach such as the 55-210 or if budget allows, the 70-200 f4.Īlso, do you need an APS-C size sensor? If you are ok with a smaller sensor, you may want to consider the Sony RX10, the Panasonic FZ-1000, or even a Nikon 1 camera. For sports, it depends on how far you are. If you want a do-it-all lens, you may want to consider the 18-105 f4 (here is a review of it: ). The lens selection looks bewildering, but if you look at only the categories that pertain to you, it's much easier to line up your choices. Hi there! Thanks for checking out the blog. But from what I read especially from your standpoint, there seems to be endless possibilities and I'm not sure where to start. I feel like I should invest in a quality lens to suit my needs instead of getting the kit lens and ending up purchasing a better lens, not that the kit lens is bad. Is there an all-around lens that I could purchase for most of my needs? Looking for something within the price range equivalent to the kit lens (both Sony 16-50mm and Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3). I take photos of items and objects up close so I'm looking for a lens that would be good for macro shots. I'm somewhat of a beginner with mirrorless cameras in general I would be using the camera for portraits, sports and outdoors (I have active and crazy kids), and mostly for taking still photos of items for my shop. Hi there, I'm planning on purchasing the a6000 body only but i am having trouble trying to figure out the best lens to pair it with. It also has the widest available aperture at this focal length. If you are thinking of upgrading to full frame in the future, you might consider getting this lens, which acts as a fast normal prime on APS-C. However, it can also be used with the a6000, a5100 and other APS-C format E-mount cameras. NEW! Zeiss FE 35 f/1.4 ($1600): This is a lens designed for Sony's full frame cameras (A7, A7R, A7S, A7II). Please note that Sigma has updated this lens with the Art version but based on DXO's tests, the older lens performs significantly better (12 Pmp vs. Second, its maximum aperture is 1.3 stops less than that of the Sony or Zeiss. However, it has several disadvantages: First, it doesn't support the a6000's hybrid phase detection and relies only on contrast detection, so it focuses much more slowly compared to the Sony 35 1.8. According to DXO, the Sigma is about as sharp as the Zeiss 32 1.8 (12pmp vs. Sigma 30 f/2.8 EX ($189): This lens is almost as sharp as the Zeiss yet costs much less than either the Zeiss 32 1.8 or Sony 35 1.8. The 35 1.8 is sharp even wide open and focuses quickly. UPDATE: Sony has new FE lenses that can also be used with the a6000, a5100 or other E-mount APS-C body. Note: to the extent DXO has tested the lenses below with the a6000, you can expect identical results for the a5100 due to the identical sensor. The italicized ones are the lenses I have. So if you're considering the a6000 or a5100, you may want to check out its lens selection to see if it has the lenses that you'll need. However, when choosing your first interchangeable lens camera, I find it helpful to consider not just the camera specifications but the system as a whole - especially the lenses and to some extent its accessories (e.g. The Sony a5100 is likewise a great camera, and is one of DPReview's best cameras for beginners, with the same great sensor and quick autofocus ability as the a6000. On top of that, the a6000 is available at a $100 discount for Black Friday. The Sony a6000 is an awesome camera - it was awarded Gold by DPReview and recently came out on top of the mid-range mirrorless camera roundup.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |